By Corey R. Minkanic, AP

In public school districts across the country, teachers are facing layoffs thanks to years of oversized budgets and recent shrinking revenues. But with the federal government's ability to print money, some people, including President Obama, want a bailout for public schools — $23 billion in the proposed "Keep Our Educators Working Act."

Obviously, educating children is critical to our future, but this irresponsible behavior begs the simple question of why do Moms and Dads lose their jobs while school administrators, educrats and teachers get unlimited job protection? Maybe it's because the federal government can print money without considering what it will cost our children. And maybe it's because the education monopoly is once again in overdrive to protect the adults at the expense of kids.

Job one: Job security

For too long education spending has been out of control — massive increases with no corresponding results. InWashington, D.C., for example, officials claim the per-pupil expenditure is $8,322 for the 49,000 pupils in its school system. Yet the Cato Institute says that if you do some honest math, the number is actually about $25,000 per child, which is about the same cost in Newark, N.J. Yet both districts have some of the worst schools in the nation, and parents have lined up in droves to enroll in school choice and charter school programs.

Here's the problem: Simply printing money to bail out teachers helps neither the kids nor the teachers, unless of course your real and only aim is job security. The teaching profession, not to mention children, would actually be better off if some teachers were in different jobs. It's always better to have a school full of good teachers than have the federal government prop up a system where everybody gets to keep his job — with no regard to whether teachers are good or bad.

If this president and Congress really wanted to help children and benefit teachers, it would emancipate students so their parents could use their own tax dollars to obtain educational services wherever they wanted — at charter schools, virtual schools or with a voucher to transfer to the private school of their choice. But that's not really what they want. Instead, they want to maintain a status quo that is designed to benefit the adults rather than brighten the future of children.

Change the model

Chicago and many other major inner-city schools make national headlines because they are so violent that children are hurt or killed going to school or even while in school. The dropout rate continues to plague many urban areas and rural states, as does the achievement gap. And per-pupil expenditures nationwide have increased 60% since 1985, yet academic achievement is not improving with it, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

None of this is going to change by yet another bailout or by doing the same thing we have done for the last 40 years. If Congress wants to print more greenbacks and push America closer to economic collapse through another multibillion dollar bailout, it would be wiser to spend the money on those who will be inheriting our nation's debt and who might make more rational decisions than we are right now — our children.

Bail out the kids before ever giving another penny to the adults. Give them vouchers and a real chance to save our bacon in the future. It might be our only chance.

Robert Enlow is president and CEO of the Foundation for Educational Choice, the school choice legacy foundation of Milton and Rose Friedman.